Urban Culture Institute
  • Home
  • Projects
    • Worcester
    • Howes Park
    • Coppens Square Park
    • Codman Square Park
    • Gourdin Park
    • Kulturpark Berlin
    • TEMPOart
    • Ringer Park
    • Mather School Green Space
    • MBTA Red Line Wollaston Station
    • MBTA Silver Line Extension
    • Boston Children's Hospital
    • HarborArts Boston
    • Social Muscle Club
    • Memphis Art Walk
    • To Extremes
    • Art in Architecture Study
    • BSA Placemaking Network >
      • 2019 Placemaking Seminars
      • 2018 Placemaking Seminars
      • 2017 Placemaking Seminar Series
      • Placemaking Seminar Series 2016
      • Placemaking Seminar Series 2015
      • Placemaking Seminar Series 2012
      • Placemaking Seminar Series 2011
      • Placemaking Seminar Series 2010
      • Placemaking Seminar Series 2009
      • Placemaking Seminar Series 2008
  • Blog
  • Publications
  • Team
  • Maps
    • Fenway-Kenmore
    • Fort Point-Seaport
  • Contact

Typology in Architecture and Memory

6/7/2020

1 Comment

 

by Christina Lanzl

​​All architectural archetypes contain the DNA of memory and are based on basic shapes or derivatives of circle, square, rectangle, triangle with their sheer limitless geometric potential. Vitruvius conceived the evolution of form beginning with the primitive hut in his multi-volume work, De architectura, an understanding shared the Enlightenment and published by Marc Antoine Laugier in his Essays sur l’Architecture in 1753. Providing basic shelter, the primitive hut contains the rectangle and the triangle in its ground plane and section.
 
The lineage of typologies continues to be explored by architectural historians. Siegfried Gideon, for instance, considered the evolution of the circle: “The circular structure […] moved from the primitive round hut through several intermediary stages to the cylindrical rotunda of the tholos: a form that had an unusual vitality and acquired many different meanings. The shape originally was related to chthonic forces. In the Roman era, it became linked with the cosmos through the development of the radiating form of the cupola dome.” (Gideon, p. 79) Considered more globally, the round building appears among the earliest structures in many cultures: as Neolithic mounds in various regions around the world, in the African kraal or boma villages, the Native American hogan and the teepee, the Aboriginal humpy and the igloo of the Eskimos, the structures of the Hakka or of the Ashoka dynasty found at Sanchi and elsewhere in Asia.
 
Cultural Memory
Architects, commissioning agencies, clients or builders determine form, function and program of architecture. Based on (historic) context and/or aesthetic decisions, architecture contains vernacular or monumental, sacred or secular, traditional or avantgarde design principles. Over millennia, architects and builders have continuously drawn inspiration from the past to inform the the present and future. To do so, memory has been a consistent building block in developing form. Memory connects us humans to our individual and collective pasts, whether they are of a pleasant nature or conjure up sadness and loss.
 
In examining the concept of cultural memory, renowned literary theory scholar, Aleida Assmann, recognizes two basic configurations: metaphors of space and metaphors of time, concluding that “the media of writing, photography, and electronic forms of storage provide consecutive metaphors and models for the internal mechanisms and dynamics of memory.” (Assmann, p. 137) Indeed, the physical manifestations of our collective memory largely consist of art and architecture starting with the Paleolithic, 400,000 years ago. Some of these harbingers of the past are still standing while others have disappeared. Similarly, Marc Streib notes that “buildings and their remains suggest stories of human fate, both real and imaginary.” (Streib, p. 21) The vast archive of our cultural memory continues to be extant because residues of our past have been (re)discovered, recorded, analyzed, (re)visited and documented through the ages.
 


Buildings are storage houses and museums of time and silence. Architectural structures have the capacity of transforming, speeding up, slowing down, and halting time.

Marc Streib. Spatial Recall: Memory in Architecture and Landscape, p. 18


Architecture History Project: Typology, Memory & Place

A project of Dr. Christina Lanzl and her Architecture History 01 seminar students in the Department of Architecture at Wentworth Institute of Technology, fall 2019.
Course coordinator: Prof. Anne-Catrin Schultz.


Architecture History and Theory 01 students: Zahra Ali, Spencer Asselin, Lenny Bamberg, Jordan Bembe, Sofia Bertine, Mary Bowman, Braeden Chan, Skylar Chardon, Carvens Charles, Coleman Conner, Reece Cortez, Emily Current, Dante Egizi, Ryan Estremera, Patrick Gould, Maegan Herd, Christopher Hudson, Calvin Johnson, Isabelle Morris, Royce Pease, Emilia Polanco, Ben Procter, Emily Quach, Casey Remillard, Paul Rudolph, Jona Sulaj, Gillian Valanzola, Amber Vuong, Anna Wason and Lexi Winston

Project focus was to investigate the dialogue on memory of place. Recognizing and analyzing architectural typologies, i.e. classifications according to general type, was an important aspect of the learning outcomes. Working on this objective, students selected a historic building for analysis. A corresponding, modern or contemporary building was chosen by each student that shares a typology or organizational scheme with the historic antecedent.

​Students explored the layer of memory in sites ranging from antiquity to contemporary architecture. The task was to briefly lay out relationships concerning space, program, design or activity. Inquiries focused on various topics, including materiality, construction, scale, organization and hierarchy.

​
Bibliography
Assmann, Aleida. Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
 
Gideon, Siegfried. Architecture and the Phenomenon of Transition: The Three Space Conceptions in Architecture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
 
Streib, Marc (ed.). Spatial Recall: Memory in Architecture and Landscape. New York: Routledge, 2009.
1 Comment

    Urban Culture Institute

    The Urban Culture Institute
    ​works with diverse communities to transform civic spaces into meaningful, dynamic places. Our award-winning practice is committed to excellence in the arts and culture. 

    Archives

    May 2021
    August 2020
    June 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    June 2019
    March 2019
    November 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    June 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    September 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    September 2013
    July 2013
    March 2013
    January 2013
    November 2012

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Airport Art
    Anne-Catrin Schultz
    Art
    Art In Architecture
    Art-in-Architecture
    Artists Help Desk
    ARTitecture
    Arts And Culture
    Arts And Technology
    Art Tour
    ArtWeek Boston
    Austin TX
    Blue Trees
    Book Talk
    Boston
    Boston Center For The Arts
    Boston Creates
    Boston Society Of Architects
    BSA Space
    Campus
    Chelsea Art Walk
    Chelsea MA
    Christina Lanzl
    Christine Henseler
    Christopher Janney
    Dendroids
    Department Of Architecture
    Dieta Sixt
    Digitalkunst
    Diller+Scofidio
    Durig & Rami
    Edward Ingersoll Browne Trust Fund
    Einstein Tower
    Erich Mendelsohn
    Exhibition
    Facade
    Fort Point Arts Community
    Fort Point Tech & Art Tour
    Forum
    FPAC
    Friends Of Fort Point Channel
    Guarracino Family Gallery
    Historic Fort Point
    ICA Boston
    Imagine Boston 2030
    Institut Du Monde Arabe
    Institute Of Contemporary Art/Boston
    Jean Nouvel
    Josefine Günschel
    Julian Opie
    Julie Burros
    Kinetics
    KMD Architects
    Konstantin Dimopoulos
    Kulturpark
    Kunst Im öffentlichen Raum
    Land Art
    Landing Studio
    Materialitaet
    Mather School
    Medien
    MIT Museum
    Ned Kahn
    Open Room Austin TX
    Patrick Dougherty
    Peabody Essex Museum
    Placemaking
    Port Park
    Projection Mapping
    P+ Studio
    Public Art
    Richard Bertman
    Richard McGuinness
    Roxy Paine
    Sculpture
    Soma
    Stefan Pietryga
    Steven Holl
    Stickwork
    Storefront For Art And Architecture
    The Blue Trees
    Urban Culture Institute
    UrbanScreen
    Vancouver Biennial
    Vito Acconci
    WBUR
    Wentworth
    Whitney Biennial

Proudly powered by Weebly